Statewide assessment of telehealth use for obstetrical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic started a period of rapid transition to telehealth in obstetrical care delivery to maintain social distancing and curb the spread of the virus. The use of telehealth, such as telephone and video visits, remote imaging interpretation, and provider-to-provider consultations, increased in the early months of the pandemic to maintain access to prenatal and postpartum care. Although there is considerable literature on the use of telehealth in obstetrical care, there are limited data on widespread telehealth use among different practice types and patient populations during the pandemic and whether these are preferred technologies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe variations in telehealth use for obstetrical care among practices in North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic and to outline future preferences and needs for continued telehealth use. This study also aimed to delineate telehealth use among rural and micropolitan and metropolitan practices to better understand if telehealth use varied by practice location. STUDY DESIGN: A web-based survey was distributed to practice managers of obstetrical practices in North Carolina from June 14, 2020 to September 14, 2020. Practice managers were contacted through assistance of the Community Care of North Carolina Pregnancy Medical Home program. Practice location was defined as rural, micropolitan, or metropolitan based on the county population. The survey assessed telehealth use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, types of modalities used, and preferences for future use. Descriptive statistics were performed to describe survey responses and compare them by practice location. RESULTS: A total of 295 practice managers were sent a web-based survey and 98 practice managers responded. Responding practices represented 66 of 100 counties in North Carolina with 50 practices from rural and micropolitan counties and 48 practices from metropolitan counties. The most common type of provider reported by practice managers were general obstetrician and gynecologists (85%), and the most common practice type was county health departments (38%). Overall, 9% of practices reported telehealth use before the pandemic and 60% reported telehealth use during the pandemic. The most common type of telehealth modality was telephone visits. There were no significant differences in the uptake of telehealth or in the modalities used by practice location. A total of 40% of practices endorsed a preference for continued telehealth use beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. The most commonly reported need for continuation of telehealth use was assistance with patient access to telehealth technologies (54%). There were no significant differences in the preferences for telehealth continuation or future needs by practice location. CONCLUSION: Telehealth use increased among a variety of practice types during the pandemic with no variation observed by practice location in terms of modalities used, future preferences, or needs. This study assessed statewide uptake of and differences in obstetrical telehealth use during the early COVID-19 pandemic. With telehealth becoming an integral part of obstetrical care delivery, this survey has implications for anticipating the needs of practices and designing innovative solutions for providers and pregnant people beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Social Determinants of Health in Maternity Care: A Quality Improvement Project for Food Insecurity Screening and Health Care Provider Referral.

Purpose: This quality improvement project evaluated implementation of social determinants of health screening and referral for food insecurity. Methods: Four obstetric providers used study-developed resources to screen and refer English-speaking patients (n=14) during clinic visits. Providers and patients completed post-visit questionnaires. Provider feedback informed improvements to the intervention approach for consecutive study shifts. Results: Providers and patients reported high satisfaction with encounters. Referrals were made for four patients. Challenges to implementation included resource organization, time constraints, and integration into clinic workflow. Conclusion: Processes for universal screening and tailored information provision are areas to continue to strengthen for establishing equitable health care.